Visiting Izmir, I knew I was coming to a large modern town.
I was fascinated by the city’s past, and wanted to search out some of the
remnants of what Izmir had once been. But I had no illusions, and was not
expecting much. There are older pockets, notably the bazaar area, a warren of
busy narrow streets clustered around the town’s oldest mosques, close to the
Konak, the centre of the city’s government. Older buildings are also dotted
around the streets just behind the long seafront quay, the Cordon. But most of
Izmir is modern, ugly and uninspiring. It was not always so. For Izmir was once
Smyrna, one of the great cosmopolitan metropolises of the Levant, a splendid jumble
of different nations, religions, cultures and architectural styles.
Visitors to Smyrna in the 19th century and at the
beginning of the 20th described it as a kind of paradise. Giles Milton titled
his book about the destruction of the city in the fire of 1922 ‘Paradise Lost’.
Phillip Mansel, in his book about the cities of the Levant, cites several
visitors who were overwhelmed by Smyrna’s charms. The Turkish writer Naci
Gundem described it as like a ‘fairy-tale country’, with ‘a magic atmosphere
which made the most depressed souls end by laughing.’ The British writer Norman
Douglas, who visited in 1895, wrote that it ‘seemed to be the most enjoyable
place on earth.’ Like many visitors, he was struck by the city’s cosmopolitan
character, ‘the variegated crowds about the harbour, eastern bustle and noise.’
Smyrna as it was
As in other great Levantine cities, several nations
rubbed shoulders in Smyrna, and many languages were spoken. As well as Turks,
there were large Greek, Armenian and Jewish communities, as well as western
European ‘Franks’: French, British, Italians and Dutch, and, by the beginning
of the 20th century, Americans. Trade built Smyrna, and fabulous fortunes were
made. Many of the western European families had lived in Smyrna for
generations. Some of them had never visited their professed home countries.
They were Levantines, and Smyrna was their home. Christian churches of various
denominations, mosques and synagogues all contributed to the colour of the
city.
But tension in Smyrna was never far below the surface.
For Turks, the privileges enjoyed by the western Franks under the notorious ‘Capitulations’,
and the powers granted to their consuls, were a source of humiliation. The
wealth of Greek and Armenian merchants was resented. Conflicts among the great
powers all too often brought bloodshed to the streets of Smyrna. The Battle of
Çeşme, 50 miles west of Smyrna, in 1770, when a Russian fleet destroyed its
Ottoman counterpart, was followed by a massacre of Smyrna Greeks, whose
enthusiasm for their fellow Orthodox Russians was well known. Then, as on later
occasions, Christians took refuge on foreign ships moored in the harbour. In
1797, the murder of a janissary by two Cephalonian Greeks led to a rampage
along Frank Street, the centre of the western European community, and the
burning of churches and consulates. Hundreds of Christians, mainly Greeks, were
murdered, and the fires spread to the Greek and Armenian quarters. The Greek
revolt in 1821 brought massacres of Greeks in Smyrna, as in Istanbul.
Greeks were not always the victims. On several
occasions in the 19th century, Greeks in Smyrna accused Jews of ritually
sacrificing Christian children, leading to attacks on Jews. In 1901, the bells
of St. Photeini monastery rang out to call people to anti-Jewish riots. Yet
despite all this, Smyrna’s cosmopolitan character endured. The Greek community
thrived. Its schools were considered among the best in the town; its cultural
life was rich; its merchants built opulent mansions. Smyrna’s Jews continued to
build synagogues. And when the authorities had the will, they could limit the
fallout of interethnic strife. In 1895 and 1896, Armenian terrorist attacks in
Istanbul were followed by massacres of thousands of Armenians, but in Smyrna
the governor organised patrols to prevent such revenge attacks. When in 1915
the order came from the Ottoman government to deport Smyrna’s Armenians, the
city’s enlightened governor, Rahmi Bey, a cosmopolitan Levantine to his core,
refused to comply. As in Salonika, following the Young Turk revolution in 1908
there was an outpouring of joy and optimism in Smyrna that cut across ethnic
and confessional lines.
Yet any appearance of positive inter-communal
relations, or of an over-arching Smyrna identity that could encompass
differences, proved illusory, or at best a very thin veneer. It began to fall
apart with the Balkan wars of 1912 and 1913. Some Turks now considered that
only the loyalty of Muslims could be counted on. Mustafa Kemal (later Ataturk)
recorded seeing the Cordon in Smyrna ‘full of members of a race which was our
sworn enemy.’ Greeks, for their part, no longer disguised their longing to be
incorporated in the mother country, which increasingly funded Greek national
organisations in Smyrna.
The peculiar Levantine world survived in Smyrna in the
First World War. While many British and French Smyrniots left to fight in their
respective armies, others remained behind, and, despite some initial
difficulties, continued to live much as before, protected by Rahmi Bey. Western-owned
businesses continued to operate, even supplying uniforms to the Ottoman army.
This was a feature of Smyrna. During an earlier war with Greece, the Smyrna
authorities had allowed Greeks, Ottoman subjects among them, to go off to join
the Greek army, with flags flying and the Greek anthem playing, and with
tickets and food provided by the Greek consul.
The old Muslim quarter, Izmir
Smyrna’s tragedy began with the arrival of Greek
troops in May 1919. The First World War was over. At its close, Greece was on
the winning, Allied side, and its government looked forward to picking apart
the corpse of the prostrate Ottoman Empire. Following the Greek landing, a
fight broke out at the Ottoman barracks, near the Konak, leading to hundreds of
deaths, mainly Turkish. Some Turkish prisoners were summarily killed on the
Cordon, and Greek soldiers ran amok in the Muslim quarter. A few Greeks still
wearing the fez were mistaken for Turks and also killed. But the Greeks, in
their hour of triumph, had not reckoned with Mustafa Kemal, who was soon
beginning to organise Turkish resistance in Anatolia.
Yet under Greek occupation, Smyrna’s cosmopolitan
spirit still hung on, in large part thanks to another enlightened ruler, the
Greek High Commissioner, Aristides Sterghiades. He had governed the partly
Muslim city of Ioannina, near Greece’s border with Albania, in 1913, and he was
determined to maintain good relations with Muslims in Smyrna. He punished some
who had murdered Turks following the Greek army’s arrival, executing
ringleaders. During his period in control, Turkish remained an official
language, alongside Greek, and the number of Turkish-language newspapers
actually increased. Some Turkish officials cooperated with the new regime.
Smyrna’s Greeks loathed him.
But Smyrna could not survive the brutalities of the
war in Anatolia. The Greek army came close to capturing Ankara, but, as its
lines of communication were over-extended, and as Kemal’s army grew in
strength, its fortunes were reversed. Following its rout in August 1922, its
soldiers fled pell-mell for the coast, slaughtering, burning and raping as they
went. Many of the Turkish soldiers advancing behind them were bent on revenge.
On 9 September, the first Turkish troops entered Smyrna, Kemal arriving the
following day. Kemal issued a proclamation threatening death to any Turkish
soldier who harmed civilians. It had no effect. The Orthodox Archbishop, Chrysostomos,
a firebrand Greek nationalist and a figure of hate for Turks, was torn apart by
a mob as he left a meeting with the newly appointed city governor at the Konak.
Some Turks who had collaborated with the Greek occupation were murdered.
As pillage, rape and murder escalated, fires began to
be set in the Armenian quarter. Having been spared under Rahmi Bey, Smyrna’s
Armenians were finally subjected to the wrath, the extraordinary vindictiveness
harboured by many Turks towards their nation. When, on 13 September, the wind
changed direction, blowing away from the Muslim and Jewish quarters, the
various fires in the Christian quarters merged into an inferno. Most of the
Greek and Armenian quarters, and much of the Frankish quarter, were engulfed. The
human catastrophe which followed was witnessed from the foreign ships standing
out in the harbour, and by many Europeans and Americans who remained in the
city. People with foreign passports had been taken aboard British, French,
Italian and American warships. The remaining Christians crowded on to the
Cordon, hundreds of thousands of them, hemmed in by the fire behind, the sea in
front, and Turkish soldiers to either side. The Cordon, the glory of Smyrna,
which Naci Gundem had written made Smyrna Smyrna, became a scene of Hell.
Smyrna burns, 1922
Watching through binoculars from the ships, sailors
saw Smyrniots on the quay robbed, pushed into the fire or into the sea, and
beaten or stabbed to death by Turkish soldiers and irregulars. Young girls were
picked out, raped, and often horribly mutilated. The sea was choked with
corpses. The stench reached the ships, where some played music in order to
drown out the noise of the unfolding horror. Some swam out from the Cordon to
the ships, where they were not always welcomed. At last, the British admiral
ordered that boats be sent to take some of the people off; some capsized under
the weight of desperate humanity.
After the fire had burned itself out, Kemal ordered
that the remaining Greeks and Armenians be expelled. Women and children, as
well as older men, were evacuated, many of them by flotillas of private boats
organised by American charity workers and under American flags. Men of military
age, often defined very liberally, were marched off into the interior, to be
abused, starved, murdered and worked to death. Few survived.
What of the responsibility for the tragedy at Smyrna?
The official Turkish position has long been that the fires were started by
Armenians and Greeks. That was what Kemal told the French consul while the fire
was still raging. This assertion is repeated in the displays at the Ahmet
Priştina City Archive and Museum, which I visited during my stay in Izmir. Yet
numerous witnesses, including Americans and French, who were present in the
city when the fires started, reported seeing Turkish soldiers and irregulars
starting the fires. And contrary to official claims, it seems they were working
under orders. Some Turkish witnesses later cast doubt on the official position.
Kemal’s Chief of Staff, Ismet Inonu, later wrote that the young said they were
following orders, while the old blamed lack of discipline. A Turkish
journalist, Falih Rifki Atay, wrote in his memoirs that he was determined to tell
the truth. The story he told was different to the reports he had written at the
time. ‘Were those responsible for the fire really the Armenian arsonists, as we
were told in those days,’ he asked? Quoting from his contemporaneous notes, he
asked ‘why were we burning down Izmir’, just as they burned all the Armenian
districts in Anatolia during the deportations of 1915? He was not alone in
blaming Nurettin Pasha, the nationalist city governor appointed by Kemal, who
he described as ‘a dyed-in-the-wool fanatic and rabble-rouser’.
There is something especially repugnant and unworthy
about blaming the enormous tragedy visited upon the Christians of Smyrna, the
arson, the theft, the mass rape, the wholesale slaughter, on the victims themselves.
Kemal was present in the city. His callousness was revealed by his statement at
a celebratory dinner while the city burned, ‘Yes, let it burn! Let it crash
down! We can replace everything.’ To what extent Turkish soldiers and
irregulars acted under orders and to what extent they ran amok, they were under
his command; they and their actions were his responsibility. Not a national
hero; a war criminal, plain and simple.
A new city has been built on the ruins of burned
Smyrna. The bustling Turkish quarter, with its bazaar, its mosques, its cafes
and kebab houses, is still there. It escaped the blaze, surely not
coincidentally. Beyond the old Muslim quarter, a synagogue stands behind a high
wall topped by a still higher wire mesh fence, testament to the once
flourishing Jewish community. Nearby, the Asansor, a high lift, still takes
people up the steep cliff face to the town above. It was built by a Jewish
philanthropist at the beginning of the 20th century.
Where the Armenian quarter once stood, there is now a
large city park. It does not blot out the memory of the horrors perpetrated
there. Walking in Izmir, I found myself thinking of Lady Macbeth: ‘out, damned
spot’. Ataturk had built a new city, but he had not managed to wash away the
blood on his hands.
An old street, Izmir
Some other remnants survived. Although the long
boulevards running parallel with the Cordon are now largely modern, soulless, a
few buildings from before the fire remain, and some of the shady narrow streets
running inland from the coast are intact, retaining an echo of the charm of old
Smyrna. Here and there, grand buildings survive. Little clusters of old
buildings stand out on the Cordon, one of which was occupied by Ataturk during
his stays in Izmir, which now houses a museum. Another, now the Greek
consulate, defiantly flies the Greek flag. The Roman Catholic church of St.
John Polycarp, a bishop of Smyrna martyred in AD 167, survives. Like many
Christian churches in Turkey, it sits behind high walls. Unfortunately, the
church only grants visits to groups. I was turned away by an unfriendly voice
on the entry phone. The 19th century Anglican Church in Alsancak, the former
Frankish quarter, also survived. It contains a plaque honouring the members of
Smyrna’s British community who gave their lives in the First World War,
fighting on the opposing side to Turkey.
Old photographs of pre-1922 Smyrna show a bustling
city, the Cordon packed with people, horses and carts, produce being loaded on
to the ships that crowded along the length of the quay. Modern Izmir is a sad
place by comparison. The Cordon is a wide open space, a featureless park dotted
with young hand-holding lovers. When I visited, there was no shipping along the
quay, just a few grey warships further out in the bay. The one similarity is
the fishermen casting their rods along the quay, both then and now. With few
exceptions, the buildings along the Cordon are modern blocks. There are cafes,
but none of them match up to the elegance, the style of old Smyrna. When Kemal
arrived in Smyrna, before the fire destroyed it, he drank a raki at the Hotel
Kraemer. Now an equestrian statue of Kemal stands where the famous hotel once
stood. On its plinth is a plaque quoting Kemal’s famous words to his troops as
they set out on their advance towards Smyrna: ‘Soldiers! Your first goal is the
Mediterranean.’ The statue looks forlorn and alone, with major roads passing
around it on all sides. Is this ugly, modern Izmir what they fought for?
I had a similar feeling when I visited the Konak, the
seat of government. In front of it stands the clock tower, built in 1901, that
has become a symbol of Izmir. Old photos show the clock at the centre of a
busy, attractive square. No more. The area in front of the Konak has been
cleared. The clock looks lost in a large empty space. So does the attractive
little old mosque nearby, with its beautiful, colourful tiles, lost among
concrete and hideousness. Much like Thessaloniki, having been destroyed by
fire, Izmir fell victim to the worst of 20th century town planning and
architecture. Following the fire, The Times wrote that ‘one of the richest
cities in the Levant is like a skeleton’. Izmir was rebuilt. But the spirit of
the marvellous, rich, diverse city that was Smyrna was destroyed forever.